• Home
  • Store
    • Newsletter Subscriptions
    • Multimedia Subscriptions
    • Books
    • eBooks
    • ABPN SA Courses
  • CME Center
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Webinars
    • Blog
  • Newsletters
    • General Psychiatry
    • Child Psychiatry
    • Addiction Treatment
    • Hospital Psychiatry
    • Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Log In
  • Register
  • Welcome
  • Sign Out
  • Subscribe
Home » Treatment as Usual Effective for ADHD and Anxiety Disorders

Treatment as Usual Effective for ADHD and Anxiety Disorders

October 1, 2010
From The Carlat Child Psychiatry Report
Issue Links: Learning Objectives | Editorial Information
Editor-in-Chief, Caroline Fisher, PhD, MD. 

Subject:
TREATMENT AS USUAL

Short Description:
Treatment as Usual Effective for ADHD and Anxiety Disorders

Background:
Studies of “treatment as usual” in outpatient child and adolescent psychiatry settings are hard to come by. Recent research out of Germany looked at the effectiveness of the usual treatment for four psychiatric disorders: ADHD, anxiety disorder (AD), depressive disorder (DD), and conduct disorder (CD). In this observational study, researchers followed all new admissions at nine participating outpatient child and adolescent psychiatry practices for one year. All participating practices offered care from a variety of practitioners (eg, pediatricians and psychotherapists in addition to psychiatrists) and offered various forms of intervention, including several styles of individual and family psychotherapy, academic support, and psychopharmacology. Information was collected by standardized telephone interviews with patients or their parents at admission into the practice, three months later, and at one year. Although interview data was available from 800 of the original 1182 patients after one year, the data used in this analysis was only from 306 patients for which parents had completed the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) at both admission and at the one year point. Within the group of 306, the mean age was 8.8 years (+/- 3.3 years). Diagnostically, 94 had ADHD, 57 CD, 38 DD, 53 AD, and 64 had some other diagnosis. Fifty-eight percent had received less than eight sessions of evaluation or consultation, 42% received greater than eight sessions; with the range encompassing zero to 50 child sessions and zero to 40 parent sessions. Twenty-six percent received pharmacotherapy of some kind. Overall 66% of patients had no clinically relevant symptoms of their illnesses after one year of treatment. Researchers analyzed if how much time spent in therapy was a factor in improvement. They found that patients with “high dose” therapy (greater than nine sessions) showed more improvement than patients with “low dose” therapy (from one to eight sessions) for ADHD and AD, and calculated a small to moderate effect size for “dose” of therapy in these disorders. There was not a significant difference in effectiveness between the two for CD, and researchers found that among patients with DD, there was a group that responded well to low dose therapy and one that responded poorly to any amount of therapy (Bachmann M et al, World Psychiatry 2010;9:111–117).

TCPR's Take:
One of the difficulties of interpreting the medical literature is the problem of figuring out what works instead of just what demonstrates a statistically significant difference between groups. In this study, two thirds of patients were clearly improved after oneyear, and that’s good news no matter how you look at it. The question arises, though, whether that improvement had anything to do with treatment. The patients in this study were given individualized treatments depending on what the clinician felt they needed at the time of evaluation. Some kids presented to the clinician needing a little intervention, and some presented needing a lot. Furthermore, as a naturalistic study, treatment comprised a full spectrum of interventions—some evidence-based, some not; some well-performed, some not. The authors used statistical methods to overcome this as much as possible, and in doing so probably understate the findings. Despite that, there was a dose-effect of therapy, an important finding for advocating for therapy interventions for children and adolescents. Compare this also to the findings of Gledhill and Garralda, who evaluated patients ages 13 to 18 presenting with depression to their primary care physicians in a London clinic: After 6 months, more than 50% of them had not improved, and the average duration of symptoms was 13 months (Gledhill J and Garralda ME, Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 2010; online ahead of print). We must be doing something right! All in all, the study is helpful in allowing a natural and realistic comparison group for the carefully controlled efficacy studies generally done. However, we have to ask ourselves: if treatment-as-usual were to incorporate more evidence-based interventions, would the effect be larger?

Child Psychiatry
KEYWORDS anxiety_disorder child-psychiatry
    www.thecarlatreport.com
    Issue Date: October 1, 2010
    SUBSCRIBE NOW
    Table Of Contents
    Approach to the Child with Intellectual Disability
    A Commentary on “Editor’s Perspective: Do Antidepressants Work in Kids?”
    Helping Our Patients With Learning Disabilities
    Understanding Common Learning and Developmental Disabilities
    Treatment as Usual Effective for ADHD and Anxiety Disorders
    Featured Book
    • CMFB2e_Cover.png

      Child Medication Fact Book for Psychiatric Practice, Second Edition (2023)

      All the important facts covering child and adolescent psychopharmacology.
      READ MORE
    Featured Video
    • therapist_canstockphoto9201097.jpg
      General Psychiatry

      Using SAMe In Clinical Practice with Garrett Rossi, MD

      Read More
    Featured Podcast
    • canstockphoto17326101.jpg
      Child Psychiatry

      Recognizing Developmental Trauma Disorder in Children and Adolescents

      Whether due to COVID, conflict, climate, or common car crashes, children often lose their caregiver at the same time they experience trauma. Our podcast with Julian Ford will...

      Listen now
    Recommended
    • Approaches to Autism Intervention

      January 31, 2022
      canstockphoto2240982_child-bubbles_thumb.jpg
    • Currently Available Cannabis Products

      September 1, 2022
    • Interpreting Assessment Discrepancies from Multiple Sources

      October 17, 2022
      ChildAssessment.png
    • Approaches to Autism Intervention

      January 31, 2022
      canstockphoto2240982_child-bubbles_thumb.jpg
    • Currently Available Cannabis Products

      September 1, 2022
    • Interpreting Assessment Discrepancies from Multiple Sources

      October 17, 2022
      ChildAssessment.png
    • Approaches to Autism Intervention

      January 31, 2022
      canstockphoto2240982_child-bubbles_thumb.jpg
    • Currently Available Cannabis Products

      September 1, 2022
    • Interpreting Assessment Discrepancies from Multiple Sources

      October 17, 2022
      ChildAssessment.png

    About

    • About Us
    • CME Center
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us

    Shop Online

    • Newsletters
    • Multimedia Subscriptions
    • Books
    • eBooks
    • ABPN Self-Assessment Courses

    Newsletters

    • The Carlat Psychiatry Report
    • The Carlat Child Psychiatry Report
    • The Carlat Addiction Treatment Report
    • The Carlat Hospital Psychiatry Report
    • The Carlat Geriatric Psychiatry Report

    Contact

    info@thecarlatreport.com

    866-348-9279

    PO Box 626, Newburyport MA 01950

    Follow Us

    Please see our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, Subscription Agreement, Use of Cookies, and Hardware/Software Requirements to view our website.

    © 2023 Carlat Publishing, LLC and Affiliates, All Rights Reserved.