• Home
  • Store
    • Newsletter Subscriptions
    • Multimedia
    • Books
    • eBooks
    • ABPN SA Courses
    • Social Work Courses
  • CME Center
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Webinars
    • Blog
    • Psychiatry News Videos
    • Medication Guide Videos
  • Newsletters
    • General Psychiatry
    • Child Psychiatry
    • Addiction Treatment
    • Hospital Psychiatry
    • Geriatric Psychiatry
    • Psychotherapy and Social Work
  • FAQs
  • Med Fact Book Apps
  • Log In
  • Register
  • Welcome
  • Sign Out
  • Subscribe
Home » The Use of Rating Scales in Diagnostic Assessment of Children

The Use of Rating Scales in Diagnostic Assessment of Children

May 1, 2012
From The Carlat Child Psychiatry Report
Issue Links: Learning Objectives | Editorial Information | PDF of Issue
Patricia H. Lee, PhD

Rating scales have been gaining favor in diagnostic assessment of children with psychiatric and/or neurodevelopmental disorders. Many children have trouble talking directly about their behavior, and rating scales can often help clinicians fill in the blanks. While they have their benefits, misuse or overreliance on rating scales can interfere with the assessment process and lead to misdiagnoses, inappropriate interventions, and poor outcomes.

Furthermore, they don’t replace the old-fashioned diagnostic interview, which brings with it alliance-building, subtle reassurance, and cultivation of the doctor-patient relationship. And don’t forget that as part of the assessment, you also want to get the perspective of the child’s parents because they are typically key players in facilitating change.

So how can rating scales be most useful to psychiatrists and patients? Which rating scales should you use? In fact, so many questionnaires exist that clinicians may find themselves in a conundrum over which scales to incorporate into their assessments, as well as what to make of those they choose. Let’s look at some of the facts you need to know about scales, as well as the pros and cons for using them when evaluating children.

The Facts About Rating Scales
First, it is important to understand how a rating scale is created. Typically, a group of experts develop a number of potential items that fit the intended construct. For example, if the rating scale is to assess behavioral problems, it might include the item: “My child hits others.” Next, the items are analyzed statistically, using techniques such as a factor analysis, to see how the test items naturally cluster together (eg, what items represent “aggression”). The scale developers then do pilot studies to weed out “bad” items and confirm the “good” ones.

When the final version of the rating scale is complete, it is standardized. A sample of people who reflect the U.S. population completes the questionnaire, and normative scores are produced to determine appropriate cut-off scores for what is deemed a clinically significant behavior. Basically, this answers the question, “How often does an average individual engage in this behavior,” generally broken down by age and gender.

In addition to standardization, test developers also need to measure the psychometric properties of a given scale. Good reliability (how consistent the scale is) and validity (does the scale measure what it’s supposed to) are essential to clinical use of a rating scale. You will usually find information on test development and psychometric properties in the manuals that accompany rating scales, and you can also obtain this information from the medical literature or the publisher.

While you may be tempted to ignore these chapters and jump into administration and interpretation, it is important that you look at these elements to ensure the scale is actually worth giving to your patients. Next it is important to understand the structure and limits of each scale. Some scales such as the Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second Edition (BASC-2), Conners Comprehensive Behavior Rating Scales (CBRS), and Personality Inventory for Children, Second Edition (PIC-2) are called multidimensional or omnibus. This type of scale evaluates the individual for several dimensions of behavior or temperament and can screen for several diagnoses. Other scales are more targeted and intended for refining specific diagnoses, such as the Conners Third Edition, known as Conners 3 (for ADHD), or the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale (GARS) (for measuring the severity of autism).

Some rating scales can be used as screens for possible psychopathology or atypical development. Others are designed to measure response to interventions over time, and are meant to be given repeatedly. You can use rating scales to confirm diagnoses, but only when you include other assessment methods such as a clinical interview and direct observation of the child.

You also want to consider the pragmatics of the scales when choosing which ones to use in your practice. Scales vary in the number of questions, the sophistication of the language, and the way the data is recorded and scored (entirely by hand, by computer after input from handwritten forms, or by input into a computer directly by the patient). It is important to choose a scale that a patient can realistically complete in the time available and that staff can score within a reasonable amount of time.

Let’s be honest; these scales are not cheap. So when you consider the use of a new scale, think about how to conserve its use as well. For example, it will be expensive to mail commercial scale forms to patients prior to an intake appointment if the no-show rate is high. In that situation, it might be better to ask the families to come to their appointment early and fill out the questionnaire in the waiting room.

The Benefits of Using Scales
Rating scales offer numerous benefits as an aid for clinical assessment. They are easy to administer and create minimal time and burden for the clinician. Scoring is also easy, particularly if they use a computer scoring program. You can gather information on how a child behaves across different settings (eg,home vs school) in a cost efficient manner without having to interview informants directly. This way, discrepant scores can inform you that specific environments or people may be triggering maladaptive behaviors. With multidimensional questionnaires, you get a lot of “bang for the buck,” since the questions cover a broad domain and can pick up areas of potential psychopathology that you may have not addressed in the clinical intake. This is particularly true given the comorbidity that exists among psychiatric and neurodevelopmental conditions. You can scan specific items and then follow up with the rater on a particular area of concern (eg, hallucinations or self-esteem).

Psychometric properties of rating scales have improved in recent years, and many are now developed using national samples through empirically valid methods. Assuming that scores adequately depict how a child is functioning, composite scores (typically T-scores) are presented in a continuous rather than dichotomous fashion. Line graphs provide a visual representation of the scores and can be helpful in revealing the severity of each domain.

Although clinicians often use a cutoff score to help determine eligibility in a diagnostic category, examining the specific scores can be useful in identifying at-risk behaviors. You can administer rating scales repeatedly across time to provide longitudinal data for a child. This can be particularly useful to track the effectiveness of specific interventions, and can be a great visual aid for a concerned parent. Rating scales meet the IDEA criteria of quantifiable data, and should therefore hold weight in determining a patient’s eligibility for an individual education plan (see CCPR, October 2011, for more detail on this).
What is a T-Score?
T-scores are standardized scores. A score of 50 represents the mean. A difference of 10 from the mean indicates a difference of one standard deviation. Thus, a score of 60 is one standard deviation above the mean, while a score of 30 is two standard deviations below the mean.Source: University of Chicago Library


Rating scales can objectify symptom severity for third-party payers, as well as show patients and their parents, evidence of improvement (or lack thereof). Norms and standardization make for a built-in way to answer the question, “But doesn’t every child do this?” Most important, you can use rating scales when the treatment isn’t working, by helping you go back to the beginning and ask, “What did I miss?”

The Limitations of Scales
Despite the numerous benefits of incorporating rating scales into diagnostic assessment, there are pitfalls you should be aware of. First of all, it is far too tempting to use the questionnaires for more than they were intended. You don’t want to use the rating scales as the primary basis for diagnosing a condition and skimp on other important parts of the assessment process. This is particularly hard to resist when the questionnaire has categories that already correspond to specific diagnoses from the DSM-IV-TR. Unfortunately, this can be an issue if the time allotted for each patient is brief.

Another negative aspect of rating scales is that the validity of the instrument is limited by the rater’s objectivity in item response. For example, some parents who are overwhelmed by their child’s misbehavior may mark “almost always” for virtually every negative behavior, which then results in a T-score well over 70 across all domains. This bias can be difficult to interpret, particularly if responses from other raters are dissimilar. Assessment of behavioral change can also be difficult over the short-term, particularly as negative behaviors might remain clinically elevated for some time even if improvement is taking place.

While rating scales are useful in identifying the frequency and severity of problem behaviors, they do not reveal how particular behaviors affect a child’s daily functioning. Therefore, follow-up interviews, inference, and other assessment tools are necessary to determine which problem behaviors should be the target of intervention.
Child Psychiatry
KEYWORDS child-psychiatry diagnostic_testing
    www.thecarlatreport.com
    Issue Date: May 1, 2012
    SUBSCRIBE NOW
    Table Of Contents
    Is Frequency a Good Indicator of Problem Drinking in Adolescents?
    Study Shows Link Between TFA Intake and ADHD
    The Use of Rating Scales in Diagnostic Assessment of Children
    Selected Diagnostic and Rating Scales
    Using Rating Scales in Your Practice
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    Featured Book
    • PB4e_Cover2.png

      Psychiatry Practice Boosters, Fourth Edition (2023)

      Teaches you the key points of 63 of the most clinically relevant studies in psychiatry.
      READ MORE
    Featured Video
    • KarXT (Cobenfy)_ The Breakthrough Antipsychotic That Could Change Everything.jpg
      General Psychiatry

      KarXT (Cobenfy): The Breakthrough Antipsychotic That Could Change Everything

      Read More
    Featured Podcast
    • shutterstock_2639254965.jpg
      General Psychiatry

      Psychopharm Secrets: Starting Meds

      Listen now
    Recommended
    • Join Our Writing Team

      July 18, 2024
      WriteForUs.png
    • Insights About a Rare Transmissible Form of Alzheimer's Disease

      February 9, 2024
      shutterstock_2417738561_PeopleImages.com_Yuri A.png
    • How to Fulfill the DEA's One Time, 8-Hour Training Requirement for Registered Practitioners

      May 24, 2024
      DEA_Checkbox.png
    • Join Our Writing Team

      July 18, 2024
      WriteForUs.png
    • Insights About a Rare Transmissible Form of Alzheimer's Disease

      February 9, 2024
      shutterstock_2417738561_PeopleImages.com_Yuri A.png
    • How to Fulfill the DEA's One Time, 8-Hour Training Requirement for Registered Practitioners

      May 24, 2024
      DEA_Checkbox.png
    • Join Our Writing Team

      July 18, 2024
      WriteForUs.png
    • Insights About a Rare Transmissible Form of Alzheimer's Disease

      February 9, 2024
      shutterstock_2417738561_PeopleImages.com_Yuri A.png
    • How to Fulfill the DEA's One Time, 8-Hour Training Requirement for Registered Practitioners

      May 24, 2024
      DEA_Checkbox.png

    About

    • About Us
    • CME Center
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us

    Shop Online

    • Newsletters
    • Multimedia Subscriptions
    • Books
    • eBooks
    • ABPN Self-Assessment Courses

    Newsletters

    • The Carlat Psychiatry Report
    • The Carlat Child Psychiatry Report
    • The Carlat Addiction Treatment Report
    • The Carlat Hospital Psychiatry Report
    • The Carlat Geriatric Psychiatry Report
    • The Carlat Psychotherapy Report

    Contact

    carlat@thecarlatreport.com

    866-348-9279

    PO Box 626, Newburyport MA 01950

    Follow Us

    Please see our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, Subscription Agreement, Use of Cookies, and Hardware/Software Requirements to view our website.

    © 2025 Carlat Publishing, LLC and Affiliates, All Rights Reserved.