• Home
  • Store
    • Newsletter Subscriptions
    • Multimedia Subscriptions
    • Books
    • eBooks
    • ABPN SA Courses
  • CME Center
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Webinars
    • Blog
  • Newsletters
    • General Psychiatry
    • Child Psychiatry
    • Addiction Treatment
    • Hospital Psychiatry
    • Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Log In
  • Register
  • Welcome
  • Sign Out
  • Subscribe
Home » Antidepressants: When Dosage Matters
CLINICAL UPDATE

Antidepressants: When Dosage Matters

April 5, 2022
Rehan Aziz, MD.
From The Carlat Psychiatry Report
Issue Links: Learning Objectives | Editorial Information | PDF of Issue
Rehan Aziz, MD. Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Neurology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School. Dr. Aziz has disclosed no relevant financial or other interests in any commercial companies pertaining to this educational activity.

When it comes to dosing antidepressants, it’s often assumed that more is better. While this is true for a few meds, most second-generation antidepressants don’t clearly work better at higher doses. In this article, I’ll review the evidence on antidepressant dose-response relationships and the optimal dose ranges for some antidepressants.

First-generation antidepressants
When patients have a poor antidepressant response, clinicians are taught to maximize the antidepressant’s dose before switching medications. Supporting this practice, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) guidelines state that starting doses should be raised slowly, as tolerated, toward a therapeutic dose, and then raised further toward the maximum dose if recovery is not reached (www.tinyurl.com/2r5xuks2). These guidelines are likely evidence-based for first-generation antidepressants, but they are not clearly applicable to the second-generation antidepressants.

Older agents like the monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and tricyclic antidepressants have dose-dependent responses. This means that as the dose is increased, patients usually respond better, within the FDA-approved dose range.

For most psychiatric medications, we can check serum levels to gauge adherence, but with some tricyclics these levels also guide the dosing. Imipramine and amitriptyline show a linear relationship between blood levels and clinical improvement. For nortriptyline, the majority of studies show an inverted “U-shaped” relationship between plasma levels and clinical response. Plasma levels less than 50 ng/mL are inadequate for clinical response, and levels greater than 150 ng/mL are associated with worsening depression. Intermediate levels within a “therapeutic window” of 50–150 ng/mL are necessary for antidepressant response (Amsterdam J et al, Am J Psychiatry 1980;137(6):653–662). The table immediately below lists established therapeutic plasma levels for some tricyclics.

Table: Therapeutic Ranges for Tricyclics


Table: Therapeutic Ranges for Tricyclics


(Click to view full-size PDF.)


Second-generation antidepressants
Turning to the second-generation antidepressants, most studies describe a flat dose-response curve, meaning that low doses are just as effective as high doses. A recent meta-analysis by Furukawa and colleagues supports this idea and adds to our understanding of the optimal dose ranges for second-generation drugs ­(Furukawa TA et al, Lancet Psychiatry 2019;6(7):601–609).


Furukawa’s team looked at 77 studies that altogether included 19,364 participants (mean age 43, 61% women). For the SSRIs, venlafaxine, and mirtazapine, the team evaluated dose, response, and side effect relationships. All SSRI doses were converted to fluoxetine equivalents for ease of comparison.


Among the SSRIs, there was a slow increase in effectiveness up to 20–40 mg fluoxetine equivalents. But above 40 mg fluoxetine equivalents, there was no further improvement, and some patients trended toward poorer response. Dropouts due to adverse effects increased throughout the dosage range but were particularly troubling at doses greater than 40 mg fluoxetine equivalents. The relationship between dose, efficacy, and dropouts showed that SSRIs worked best in the low to middle ranges, between 20 and 40 mg fluoxetine equivalents. Beyond that, adverse effects overshadowed any response.


Venlafaxine had a more classic dose-response relationship. It initially had increasing effectiveness in the range of 75–150 mg daily, followed by a more modest increase in benefit with doses up to 151–375 mg daily. Mirtazapine’s efficacy increased up to a dose of 30 mg daily and then decreased. Dropouts due to adverse effects rose sharply with increasing doses of both drugs. Vortioxetine isn’t as well studied and doesn’t have an obvious dose-response relationship between 10 and 20 mg/day.

The table at the bottom of the page lists the ideal daily dosage ranges for SSRIs, venlafaxine, and mirtazapine in depression based on Furukawa’s work and other studies.


The takeaway here is to dose and titrate SSRIs, venlafaxine, and mirtazapine to the ranges listed in the table. If your patient doesn’t respond after four to six weeks at the highest optimal dose, then it’s probably time to switch to a new drug. If there’s a partial response, consider adding a second medication.



Table: Optimal Daily Dose Ranges for Second-Generation Antidepressants


Table: Optimal Daily Dose Ranges for Second-Generation Antidepressants


(Click to view full-size PDF.)



Awkward conversations
Sometimes, patients insist on raising the dose beyond what the evidence supports, such as increasing sertraline from 50 to 150 mg/day. Many clinicians oblige these requests if they can’t find other agreeable options. If the patient improves, keep in mind that the benefit may be due to the placebo response or the tincture of time. Some patients recover through the natural course of the illness, while others may take longer than four weeks to respond to an antidepressant. Six weeks is recommended for the first antidepressant trial, and a new analysis of the STAR*D trial suggests 12 weeks is necessary to assess the second trial (Rush AJ et al, J Clin Psychiatry 2020;11;81(5):19m12949). A judicious titration downward at a later date, once things have settled down, may be worthwhile.


There’s also the possibility of mood worsening at higher doses. SSRIs can cause some depressing side effects like sleep disruption, low libido, and emotional apathy. In a large randomized controlled trial that compared sertraline at 50, 100, and 200 mg/day in major depression, the higher doses added no benefits but doubled the rate of side effects like agitation, insomnia, sedation, and nausea (Fabre LF et al, Biol Psychiatry 1995;38(9):592–602).


Lastly, patients with comorbidities like anxiety disorders, pain, and OCD may do better with higher doses of SSRIs, as these disorders usually require doses up to the FDA-approved maximum. Also, keep in mind that human variability is wider than these studies can cover. The bell curve suggests that 5% of our patients may fall outside these guidelines, either requiring an unusually high dose or responding to a very low one. For patients who seem to need a very high dose, I’ll try to decrease it when things stabilize to reduce long-term risks.


Carlat Verdict:
Dose SSRIs, venlafaxine, mirtazapine, and bupropion in the low-to-medium ranges to achieve optimal efficacy, while minimizing side effects.

General Psychiatry
KEYWORDS antidepressants depression ssris
Rehan Aziz, MD.

Mood Stabilizers for Bipolar Disorder in Older Adults: Special Considerations

More from this author
www.thecarlatreport.com
Issue Date: April 1, 2022
SUBSCRIBE NOW
Table Of Contents
Thyroid Augmentation in Bipolar Disorder
Prior Authorizations for Psychiatric Medications: A Primer for Frustrated Clinicians
Anticholinergic-Associated Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia
Structural Brain Changes After ECT for Depression
Antidepressants: When Dosage Matters
CME Post-Test - Thyroid and Mental Illness, TCPR, April 2022
DOWNLOAD NOW
Featured Book
  • MFB6eCover.jpg

    Medication Fact Book for Psychiatric Practice, Sixth Edition (2022)

    Guidance, clinical pearls, and bottom-line assessments covering the medications you use in your...
    READ MORE
Featured Video
  • therapist_canstockphoto9201097.jpg
    General Psychiatry

    Using SAMe In Clinical Practice with Garrett Rossi, MD

    Read More
Featured Podcast
  • canstockphoto4921771.jpg
    General Psychiatry

    Psychopharm Commandment #6: MAOIs

    MAOIs rank high in efficacy and are pretty well tolerated too, as long as you watch for two critical interactions.

    Listen now
Recommended
  • Approaches to Autism Intervention

    January 31, 2022
    canstockphoto2240982_child-bubbles_thumb.jpg
  • Currently Available Cannabis Products

    September 1, 2022
  • Interpreting Assessment Discrepancies from Multiple Sources

    October 17, 2022
    ChildAssessment.png
  • Approaches to Autism Intervention

    January 31, 2022
    canstockphoto2240982_child-bubbles_thumb.jpg
  • Currently Available Cannabis Products

    September 1, 2022
  • Interpreting Assessment Discrepancies from Multiple Sources

    October 17, 2022
    ChildAssessment.png
  • Approaches to Autism Intervention

    January 31, 2022
    canstockphoto2240982_child-bubbles_thumb.jpg
  • Currently Available Cannabis Products

    September 1, 2022
  • Interpreting Assessment Discrepancies from Multiple Sources

    October 17, 2022
    ChildAssessment.png

About

  • About Us
  • CME Center
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us

Shop Online

  • Newsletters
  • Multimedia Subscriptions
  • Books
  • eBooks
  • ABPN Self-Assessment Courses

Newsletters

  • The Carlat Psychiatry Report
  • The Carlat Child Psychiatry Report
  • The Carlat Addiction Treatment Report
  • The Carlat Hospital Psychiatry Report
  • The Carlat Geriatric Psychiatry Report

Contact

info@thecarlatreport.com

866-348-9279

PO Box 626, Newburyport MA 01950

Follow Us

Please see our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, Subscription Agreement, Use of Cookies, and Hardware/Software Requirements to view our website.

© 2023 Carlat Publishing, LLC and Affiliates, All Rights Reserved.