It probably comes as little surprise to most readers that manufacturer-sponsored research is more likely to yield an outcome favorable to the sponsored product than similar non-sponsored research. What may be surprising is that there is actually a good-sized body of published research (non-sponsored, of course!) on this very topic.

There is trouble for the pharmaceutical industry in CME City. The ACCME (Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education), which sets national standards for accredited CME activities, has tightened up its requirements for commercial support, which is giving drug companies, private medical education firms, and assorted hired guns a collective case of indigestion.

Many readers have wondered why I decided to publish The Carlat Report. Well, back in the day, I was a member of the speaker’s bureau of four pharmaceutical companies. I would typically travel to the offices of primary care physicians nearby and talk up the sponsor’s drug.

1992 was a very big year in the history of the relationship between the FDA and the pharmaceutical industry. That year, Congress passed the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), allowing the FDA to charge pharmaceutical companies hundreds of thousands of dollars per drug for the drug approval process.

Here’s a scenario for you. You have five medications to choose from. They are all FDA approved for the same indications. Any head-to-head study among them has shown equivalent efficacy. Three of them are associated with significant weight gain, hypercholesteremia, and diabetes risk. Two of them are not. Your job is to take a stand on what you would recommend as "first-line" medication for the disorder in question.

Clozapine (trade name, Clozaril) is a drug that none of us would prescribe if all things were equal. With the potentially catastrophic side effect of agranulocytosis, along with a metabolic side effect profile worse even than Zyprexa’s, the only reason to expose living beings to this medication is that it is reputed to be the most effective antipsychotic under the sun. But is it?

We knew it was about to happen. We just didn’t know it would happen all at once. Between July and September of 2004, Seroquel, Geodon, and Abilify sequentially won approval for the treatment of manic episodes in bipolar disorder.

I know what you're thinking, "This is going to be a Cymbalta vs. Effexor article, and Cymbalta will get another TCR drubbing as it did last year." Not quite. In fact, there are two major battles to be reviewed: Effexor vs. Cymbalta, but probably more relevant, Effexor vs. Lexapro.

The notion that passing magnets over people's heads could make them happier has been around for a very, very long time, at least since the 1770s. The Viennese physician Franz Anton Mesmer used the technique in front of large 18th century audiences, and was so successful that Louis XVI funded the establishment of a "Magnetic Institute" in France to work on the technique further.

Very quietly, under our very noses, most of the newer antidepressants have gone generic, the latest being Celexa (citalopram). Before more details, here is a little generics review for those of you who have not been keeping up with this ferociously litigious area of psychopharmacology.